Introduction
Each year over 50,000 people, the overwhelming majority Jewish, pass away and are buried in Israel, where according to the traditional burial rites (‘Field Burial’) one can bury around 300 people in a dunam of land 1. The meaning of this is that many plots of land, even in densely populated areas, are being taken up by cemeteries. In addition, the graves and the infrastructure required for them demands large amounts of concrete, whose manufacturing is a core cause of greenhouse gas emissions 2. Our sages were aware of the issue of space that a multitude of graves presents, and instructed that cemeteries not be labelled as impure sites (of which kohanim cannot enter) at a significant distance from the graves themselves, “so as not to detract from the Land of Israel” 3, however this space issue continues to grow.
The Halachic Discussion
Saturated Burial
An initial solution, implemented by Israel broadly, is ‘saturated burial’ in layers or in alcoves. These methods allow burial of up to 2,500 people in a dunam 4. The authorities discuss whether for this burial method the halachic obligation to bury the deceased in the ground is fulfilled, as it involves a barrier between the deceased and the earth or the dead being buried using dirt brought from elsewhere artificially. On this background, the Chief Rabbinic Council drafted burial guidelines which integrate building layers of dirt connected to local earth, and according to the majority of authorities this burial method is halachically permissible, of course in situations when there is a need 5. Therefore, the planning institutions must encourage and motivate the burial authorities to fulfill the halachot of burial and the obligation to preserve the environment in their totality, through various methods of saturated burial.
However, even if this is performed, it is not enough to provide a long-term response to both the issue of space and the issue of concrete consumption. Based on this, there are two methods that can limit the ecological damage: ‘kvurat eretz yisrael’ and ‘ecological burial’.
Kvurat Eretz Yisrael: Collection of the Bones
One of the methods of traditional burial in the times of the Mishnah was temporary burial in the earth for a year, afterwards collecting the bones into a jug placed in a familial mausoleum 6. In this manner, where the bones are kept in thin jugs standing next to each other in inlets, the area required for burial will significantly decrease 7. Rabbi Rafi Ostroff, the Head of the Religious Council in Gush Etzion, demonstrated in an essay in the journal ‘Techumin’ that there is no halachic obstacle to return to this burial method these days, and his words merited consensus from the halachic greats of the generation, including Rabbi Yaakov Ruza, Rabbi Dov Lior 8, Rabbi Aryeh Stern9, Rabbi Yehuda Halevi Amichai10, and Rabbi Yuval Cherlow11 .Even though at first glance there is deviation from the currently accepted burial customs, since we are dealing with a revitalization of an ancient custom, and an extraordinary need for an alternative exists, one should encourage and promote the reinvigoration of this burial method12.
Ecological Burial
An additional method of burial is the process where the dead is wrapped in biodegradable material and a tree is planted on the burial site, so the burial site becomes a park.
This method is becoming increasingly common in non-Jewish communities abroad, however it does not qualify according to halachic requirements. In the Mishnah (Ohalot 18:3), it is stated that one should not plant trees in a field where a limb was buried, and according to the majority of authorities, the meaning of the matter is the prohibition to plant any type of tree in a location where there is concern for a grave13 . Regarding the reason for this, there are those who write that the concern is that perhaps the tree’s fruits will become impure due to the deceased 14[305], there are those who write that the sages did not want to encourage people to walk through the area and become impure 15 and there are those who write that the prohibition is that the tree’s roots will harm the body and that this will be disgraceful to the dead 16.
Aside from this, there is a genuine concern that perhaps kohanim will walk under the trees and become impure. Additionally, many authorities write that planting a tree on top of a grave is against Jewish custom 17. Therefore, it seems that one should abstain from this method of burial.
In Practice:
- At the individual level: it is appropriate to choose the best possible burial method for the environment, amongst the existing, permissible options.
- On the communal level: one should encourage and advocate for using saturated burial (with layers and alcoves) over field burial. It is proper to begin the process of returning to kvurat eretz Yisrael’ where the bones are collected into a jug.
- One should not use the method of ‘ecological burial’ including planting a tree on the grave.
Jewish Sustainability – to the home page and table of contents
Notes - הערות שוליים
- N. Kessler, E. Klein, S. Chaskin. 2019. How Will We Be Buried? The Environmental Implications of Eternal Burial. Ecology and the Environment 10(3), pages 13-14.
- “Concrete: the most destructive material on Earth”. the Guardian. 25 February 2019
- Moed Katan 5b. For more regarding the engagement with the challenge of burial in the times of the sages see: Human Ecology in the Ancient World, pages 102-105.
- Kessler, Klein, Chaskin ibid.
- Yabia Omer, volume 9, Yoreh Deah, article 34; Rabbi Avraham Zvi Sheinfeld, Halacha and Ruminations on ‘Burial in Layers’, Shurat HaDin 13 (5768), pages 145-147; Rabbi Yaakov Ruza, Further Regarding the Issue of Burial in Layers, HaMa’ayan 210 (5774); Rabbi Moshe Be’eri, Burial in Buildings, Techumin 36 (5776), pages 248-256. See the overview of the argument around the topic by: Rabbi Yitzchak Bar Ze’ev, Environmental Issues and Judaism, pages 38-40.
- Yitzchak Blau, the Resurrection of the Custom of Collecting the Bones of the Dead, She’anan 23 (5778), pages 13-23. It should be emphasized that this method is not exclusive, however it was exceedingly common, as Yaakov Creuser, Likkut Atzamot, Ma’agalim 9 (5777), pages 165-180.
- Via this method, it is possible to place 3,500 graves per dunam, at the cost of ₪ 600 a grave, in contrast with the methods of burial in layers where one can place at most around 2,500 graves at a cost of over ₪10,000 a grave. See the compilation ‘Kvurat Eretz Yisrael’, the Gush Etzion Regional Religious Council.
- Rabbi Rafi Ostroff, Likkut Atzamot in Halachic Practice, Techumin 32 (5772), pages 387-392. The rabbinic letters appear on the site “Kvurat Eretz Yisrael” at the link: https://kvurat-eretz-isr.org.il
- According to Rabbi Stern, “one should not enact this method broadly, but a community that decides to act in this manner for a new burial site is allowed to do so”. This is brought in the essay of Yair Forstenburg, Initiative for Renewing the Custom of Bone Collection: New Issues, Old Solutions, Deot 82 (5778).
- Rabbi Yehuda Halevi Amichai, “Saturated Burial”, Kipa website, 12th of Tevet, 5772, at the link: http://www.kipa.co.il/ask/show/259092.
- https://shabaton1.co.il/?p=7214
- This is also concluded by Yaakov Creuser in the aforementioned essay, and is backed by Rabbi David Bigman in the appendix there.
- From the opinion of the Rambam (Tumat HaMet 8:3) it seems that the prohibition is only for fruit trees, however the Ra’avad (ibid.) writes that this is the case for non-fruit bearing trees as well.
- This is the simple meaning of the Rambam’s Commentary on the Mishnah, Ohalot 18:3. Granted, his words require analysis, for at this stage the fruits seemingly do not acquire impurity. See: Pekudat HaOhel, volume 3, pages 270-274; Divrei Daat Ohalot, volume 4, pages 350-352.
- Tosefta, Ohalot 17:11
- Chazon Ish Ohalot, article 23:6; Sridei Eish, volume 2, article 106.
- Yabia Omer, volume 7, Yoreh Deah, article 34.